Regulation and Behavior.
There’s a moment that happens often in my work.
A child throws something across the room.
A teen shuts down and refuses to speak.
An adult says, “I don’t know why I keep doing this.”
And the question that follows is usually:
How do we stop the behavior?
But I’ve learned to ask a different question first.
What is the nervous system doing right now?
Behavior is not random.
We often treat behavior as something to reduce, shape, or fix.
And yes, behavior matters. It impacts learning, relationships, safety.
But behavior doesn’t come out of nowhere.
It is organized by the nervous system.
Every action: avoidance, aggression, withdrawal, even compliance is rooted in a physiological state:
Is the body feeling safe?
Is it overwhelmed?
Is it mobilized to fight or flee?
Is it shut down?
When we skip this layer, we end up responding to behavior without understanding what’s driving it.
The nervous system is always asking one question: Am I safe?
Before a child can follow an instruction, join a peer, or tolerate frustration, their nervous system is scanning:
Is this safe enough?
If the answer is yes : you see curiosity, flexibility, learning
If the answer is no: you see:
avoidance
rigidity
big emotional reactions
or complete shutdown
These aren’t bad behaviors.
They are adaptive responses.
What looks like noncompliance might be dysregulation.
A child who won’t listen”may not be choosing not to listen.
They may be:
flooded
overstimulated
unsure how to process what’s being asked
lacking the internal regulation to respond
From the outside, it looks like defiance.
From the inside, it feels like overwhelm.
And this is where our approach matters.
In traditional behavior frameworks, we often move quickly to:
prompts
reinforcement
consequences
But if the nervous system is dysregulated, these strategies don’t land the way we expect.
Because the brain literally isn’t in a state to receive them.
So we shift the sequence:
Connection - Regulation - Learning
This might look like:
softening your voice
reducing demands
sitting nearby without pressure
using rhythm, play, or sensory input
co-regulating before asking for compliance
It’s not “giving in.”
It’s creating the conditions where behavior can actually change.
Children don’t learn regulation in isolation.
They borrow it.
From your tone.
Your pacing.
Your presence.
When we stay grounded, we offer their nervous system something to organize around.
Over time, this becomes internalized.
So where does ABA fit into this?
This is the question I care deeply about.
Behavioral strategies are powerful.
But they become more effective: not less, when paired with nervous system awareness.
Because:
reinforcement works better when the child feels safe
prompting is more effective when the brain is regulated
skill acquisition depends on access to attention and flexibility
The roots of ABA can be confronting. It comes from a compliance model.
But we should never be teaching children to comply.
We should be supporting their growth to become the best versions of themselves.
When we apply this to our understanding of the science of human behavior, we deepen our understanding of our clients and ourselves.
We move from:
“How do I stop this?”
to“What is this telling me the learner?What is this telling me?”
We become less reactive, less controlling.
More curious.
More attuned.
And often, the behavior begins to change, not because we forced it to but because the system underneath it finally feels supported.
Underneath every behavior is a body trying to find safety, balance, and connection.
And when we learn to work with that system,
not against it we don’t just change behavior.
We change everything.